A week
from today I will be sitting at home, back in Minnesota, curled up with my dog and big glass of wine, thinking back to this semester and everything I endured
within it. WAIT, let me stop myself before I get too nostalgic, and forget that
I still have a 5:45 a.m. flight standing between me and being home. I'm not
trying to say that I dislike flying, because I really, really do love being on
airplanes. But, all of the people and other factors you have to deal with while
flying, well, that's what I hate. The only part besides the airplane that I
actually enjoy about flying is the people watching as well as how airports vary
from place to place.
The fact
that these three airports, can vary so significantly has made me wonder if the
individuals that designed each airport did so with the intention of fitting
consumer preferences in that area. Or, if they maybe based their designs off of
those who will be traveling to that airport. For instance, Minneapolis is an
international hub for hundreds of different connecting flights, which in turn
may insinuate that those who travel through the airport may have longer
layovers. These long layovers could then result in a greater need for shops and
restaurants to occupy consumers as they wait for their next flight. Bozeman on
the other hand, only has select flights that run daily. This may reveal that
because there isn't large variety of consumers flying its airport there is no
need to have a large variety of shops and restaurants. In fact, it could also
be determined the Bozeman airport was designed to target consumers that are
familiar with Montana, such as locals or those who frequently vacation here.
Whereas, the Port Charlotte airport lies within the middle of the two designs.
This is due to the fact that it is an international hub, but still possesses
qualities of local consumers, such as the southern comfort rocking chairs.














